Israel
Regular Season Round 11: Ramat Gan - M.Haifa 80-67
Date: January 6, 2020
The game had a very big importance for second-ranked Maccabi Ramat Gan as it allowed them to take a leadership position. Maccabi Ramat Gan defeated 9th ranked M.Haifa in Ramat Hen 80-67. The game was dominated by American players. The best player for the winners was guard Shenise Johnson (181-90, college: Miami, FL) who scored 21 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Guard Allison Hightower (178-88, college: LSU) chipped in 19 points, 7 rebounds and 4 assists. Center Khaalia Hillsman (197-96, college: Texas A&M) produced a double-double by scoring 20 points, 16 rebounds and 5 assists and forward Kristi Bellock (186-90, college: Texas A&M) added 13 points and 9 rebounds respectively for the guests. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. As mentioned above they are at the top of the standings, which they share with Ramla. Newly promoted M.Haifa keeps the ninth place with eight games lost. M.Haifa will play next round against Petah Tikva trying to get back on the winning streak. Maccabi Ramat Gan will try to continue on its current victory against sixth ranked Hapoel Rishon Le-Zion on the road.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 11: Ramat Gan - M.Haifa 80-67
Date: January 6, 2020
The game had a very big importance for second-ranked Maccabi Ramat Gan as it allowed them to take a leadership position. Maccabi Ramat Gan defeated 9th ranked M.Haifa in Ramat Hen 80-67. The game was dominated by American players. The best player for the winners was guard Shenise Johnson (181-90, college: Miami, FL) who scored 21 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Guard Allison Hightower (178-88, college: LSU) chipped in 19 points, 7 rebounds and 4 assists. Center Khaalia Hillsman (197-96, college: Texas A&M) produced a double-double by scoring 20 points, 16 rebounds and 5 assists and forward Kristi Bellock (186-90, college: Texas A&M) added 13 points and 9 rebounds respectively for the guests. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. As mentioned above they are at the top of the standings, which they share with Ramla. Newly promoted M.Haifa keeps the ninth place with eight games lost. M.Haifa will play next round against Petah Tikva trying to get back on the winning streak. Maccabi Ramat Gan will try to continue on its current victory against sixth ranked Hapoel Rishon Le-Zion on the road.
 M.HAIFA (coach: Omri Zirlin)67 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | HiQdRj, SlRx | 47 | 6-9 (63.4%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 66 | 63 | 5 |
| 68 | HallsBij, Khiilai | 42 | 1-7 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 2-66 (98.9%) | 0 | 66 | 61 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 85 | 36 | 5 |
| 0 | mRllIZV, KQasUa | 42 | 0-64 (42.0%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 86 | 5 |
| 9 | bilVaj, biF | 63 | 5-4 (5%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | -8 | 5 |
| 65 | eifiRl, XRUi | 68 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | -6 | 5 |
| 3 | HiDiD, gijaRli | 44 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 1-1 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 68 | 63 | 5 |
| 2 | waQIsh, AipaQ | 69 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 64 | AaBaIjILaZh, qMIjF | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 66 | SlIj, AhiF | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 61-35 (35.5%) | 1-86 (82.1%) | 69-85 (20.5%) | 7 | 82 | 49 | 86 | 60 | 67 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 64 | 19 | 20 | |||
 RAMAT GAN (coach: Adan Inbar)80 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 68 | mulDiV, SduU | 40 | 4-7 (44.4%) | 5-3 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 4 | 65 | 64 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 65 | 7 | 5 |
| 66 | HaDhUITRQ, SllasIj | 44 | 9-68 (02.4%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 80 | 5 |
| 60 | zIhjsIj, AhRjasR | 45 | 1-68 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 86 | 83 | 5 |
| 3 | YaJZhiVa, YiiQi | 82 | 4-3 (90%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 64 | 5 |
| 0 | CIhRj, SlRxijdQi | 82 | 5-4 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | wil, vRL | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 63 | AhRi, bidasIj | 68 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 65 | eiMRQ, gijaRllR | 65 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 7 | GIldaj, eIja | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 86-31 (30.9%) | 7-81 (43.1%) | 66-68 (76.9%) | 66 | 82 | 47 | 61 | 67 | 60 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 66 | 25 | 97 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
