Sweden

Regular Season Round 12: Haga BG - KFUM Fry. 2 80-66

Date: January 11, 2020
There was no surprise when 8th ranked KFUM Fry. 2 (3-8) lost to fifth ranked Haga BG (6-3) in Norrkoping 66-80. The game was mostly controlled by Haga BG. KFUM Fry. 2 was better in third quarter 15-13. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded KFUM Fry. 2 44-27 including a 33-21 advantage in defensive rebounds. The best player for the winners was Jonathan Sjoman who scored 13 points and 8 rebounds. Ludvig Worge (-0) chipped in 8 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists. At the other side the best for losing team was Todor Nisavic who recorded 15 points and 6 rebounds and Isak Sjoo added 11 points and 7 rebounds respectively. Four KFUM Fry. 2 players scored in double figures. Both coaches tested many bench players saving starting five for next games. Haga BG moved-up to fourth place in South, which they share with Hogland. KFUM Fry. 2 at the other side keeps the eighth position with eight games lost. Haga BG's next round opponent will be higher ranked Kalmar (#3) on the road and it may be the game of the week. KFUM Fry. 2 will play against the league's second-placed Talje Knights (#2) and hope to win that game.

  HAGA BG80
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 WildRZV, HuDI 45 4-1 (05%) 8-0 (35%) 6-6 (655%) 8 4 0 5 6 5 6 5 5 3 64 2 3
1 valni, HuDI 82 8-8 (655%) 5-4 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 6 4 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 8 0 9 2
6 WIQDR, vudLaD 67 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 3-1 (11.9%) 5 9 9 1 3 5 4 5 5 8 2 63 2
86 KILiZRLaZ, zisBaj 62 8-0 (35%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 6 3 0 5 3 5 5 8 5 8 65 0 4
2 qQRjVIF, OiQs-qsQRf 65 5-6 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 -3 -4
84 AnIBij, zIjiUhij 88 0-7 (00.1%) 5-5 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 8 1 2 8 4 5 8 5 5 4 64 63 64
5 KiQRjQFd, WalhRlB 85 6-4 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 8 8 5 8 5 5 3 0 6 1
7 HiVijssIj, yalap 64 6-6 (655%) 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8 5 8 6 6 5 8 5 5 5 66 68 9
4 miZVBij, ARMisUaij 64 8-4 (11.9%) 5-6 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 5 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 2 63
8 Hida, ziZIM 68 8-8 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 0 2 8 3 5 5 5 5 8 3 9 6
65 WRsURQlujd, eisBus 7 8-4 (11.9%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 7
wIUil   88-47 (01.3%) 2-81 (45.2%) 68-61 (90.5%) 66 44 33 67 67 5 65 8 5 88 25 90  


  KFUM FRY. 266
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
60 AnII, osiV 35 3-2 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4-0 (15%) 3 4 9 5 3 5 8 5 5 8 66 2 -63
0 WRaMRQU, qlais 87 1-66 (03.0%) 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5 8 8 8 4 5 0 5 5 3 68 1 -65
68 XasiLaZ, wIdIQ 88 0-2 (18.0%) 5-6 (5%) 0-0 (655%) 6 0 1 5 4 5 0 6 5 6 60 67 -7
7 bZZiQUhF, SxRl 62 6-4 (44.4%) 5-0 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 6 5 6 8 -0 -4
3 XujRJ, KFlR 63 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 4 5 5 6 8 -8 -6
63 zIjssIj, waB 89 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5 4 4 4 5 5 6 5 5 8 2 66 -66
61 HiBJRhjRnid, WallaiB 69 4-2 (49.0%) 6-9 (63.4%) 6-8 (05%) 6 3 0 5 3 5 6 5 5 8 65 -8 -9
66 miaQu, bRQIj-bijji 2 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 -3
2 qlais, zRijpaRQQR 1 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 4 8 -0
77 Sl-mishi, XIih 0 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 -0
1 SMdullih, YIusRf 0 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6
5 KiQUIL, Kiij 4 5-8 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 8 4 -6 -8
wIUil   85-31 (34.0%) 0-86 (84.2%) 66-62 (16.6%) 1 86 89 1 86 5 69 8 5 61 11 48  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)