Spain

Regular Season Round 18: Alfinden - SESE 88-82

Date: February 1, 2020
There was an upset in Zaragoza where higher ranked SESE (10-7) was defeated by twelfth ranked Alfinden (6-11) 88-82 on Saturday. Alfinden shot 26 for 38 from the free-throw line, while SESE only scored six points from the stripe. Strangely SESE outrebounded Alfinden 45-29 including 19 on the offensive glass. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 22 assists. SESE was plagued by 29 personal fouls down the stretch. The best player for the winners was forward Jorge Cano (201-91, college: Bened.-Mesa) who had a double-double by scoring 17 points and 10 rebounds. Power forward Jose Malo (203-96) chipped in 15 points and 5 assists. At the other side the best for losing team was American Charlie Wilson (203-95, college: Union, TN) who recorded a double-double by scoring 20 points, 11 rebounds and 4 assists and Joaquim Galve (-93) added 12 points, 10 assists and 4 steals respectively. Five SESE players scored in double figures. Both coaches tested many bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Alfinden moved-up to eighth place in Group C-A, which they share with 4 other teams. Loser SESE keeps the fifth position with seven games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.

  ALFINDEN88
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
88 CijI, zIQDR 87 0-7 (00.1%) 8-3 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 0 0 65 8 4 3 6 5 5 4 69 85 5
61 bilI, zIsR 81 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 66-68 (76.9%) 6 8 4 0 6 1 5 5 5 6 60 81 5
44 CiUilij, kaZUIQ 86 5-8 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 3 8 6 8 6 8 4 3 6 5
64 ORlRiUI, SlRnijdQI 85 6-4 (44.4%) 5-8 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5 6 6 6 8 8 6 6 5 5 3 8 5
1 CisURllI, zuijij 61 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 8-3 (05%) 5 6 6 6 8 3 5 5 5 6 0 3 5
2 ORQRJ, eIMRQUI 85 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 6 3 0 0 6 8 5 5 5 6 4 2 5
05 OlIu, zIQDR 62 5-4 (5%) 0-0 (655%) 3-3 (655%) 6 6 8 5 8 8 6 5 5 5 67 67 5
26 ORQRJ, ARQDaI 60 6-6 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 4-3 (90%) 5 6 6 4 8 4 5 5 5 8 2 7 5
85 ORQiJi, WalBRQ 64 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 3 3 5
63 XiLiQQI, SlLiQI 7 6-8 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 6 5 8 5 5 6 8 6 5
62 bIlaji, OiMlI 2 5-6 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 6-8 (05%) 5 6 6 5 8 6 5 5 5 5 9 8 5
wIUil   64-44 (47.3%) 68-80 (32.5%) 81-42 (12.3%) 65 67 87 88 85 89 9 8 8 68 22 71  


  SESE82
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
68 GilLR, zIiEuaB 89 4-3 (90%) 8-1 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 65 4 8 3 5 6 4 68 62 5
61 WalsIj, ChiQlaR 80 2-66 (98.9%) 6-4 (44.4%) 6-6 (655%) 0 1 66 3 3 3 6 8 6 4 85 87 5
67 biQUajRJ, PsZiQ 84 8-0 (35%) 8-0 (35%) 6-6 (655%) 8 5 8 4 0 8 8 5 5 6 66 2 5
65 gaiJ, eiul 86 3-1 (11.9%) 8-0 (35%) 6-6 (655%) 4 3 9 6 8 3 5 5 5 5 60 85 5
84 AIli, GRQiQd 65 5-8 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 8 6 5 5 5 6 5 -3 5
9 vIpRJ, yRQQij 86 6-4 (44.4%) 4-7 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 4 5 4 6 5 6 6 5 5 8 68 9 5
63 bIjUilLI, SlMRQU 60 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 4 1 5 4 5 5 5 5 8 5 -8 5
2 CiBiQi, PsZiQ 64 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 6 1 9 1 8 8 5 5 5 6 6 65 5
7 dR-tDiQUR, zIQda 68 8-4 (11.9%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 3 6 5
0 CisURllIj, kaZUIQ 68 5-6 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 5 -3 5
48 kiJEuRJ, GIjJilI 7 8-8 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 5 4 6 5 5 5 5 0 4 5
3 wIuQR, SMdIuliFR 0 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 6 5
wIUil   84-34 (04.0%) 65-49 (89.5%) 1-2 (90.5%) 67 81 30 89 87 85 2 8 8 69 28 29  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)