Hungary

Semi-Finals Game 2: ZTE NKK - Pecs 2010 65-88

Date: April 3, 2011
The game was mostly controlled by Pecs 2010. ZTE was better in fourth quarter 20-15. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded ZTE 42-20 including a 33-17 advantage in defensive rebounds. It was a great shooting night for Pecs 2010 especially from behind the arc, where they had solid 72.7 percentage. The former international guard Dalma Ivanyi (178-76, college: FIU) notched a double-double by scoring 20 points, 10 rebounds and 5 assists (on 8-of-10 shooting from the field) to lead the effort and the former international guard Zsofia Fegyverneky (178-84, agency: Laszlo Vinko Services) supported her with 17 points and 8 rebounds. Five Pecs 2010 players scored in double figures. Pecs 2010's coach Zeljko Dokic felt very confident using entire bench and allowed the starting five to rest. Even 9 points and 5 rebounds by American forward Danielle Page (188-86, college: Nebraska) did not help to save the game for ZTE. Swingman Orsolya Zsovar (182-84) added 8 points and 5 rebounds for the hosts.
Top scorers:
ZTE: J.Szelesy 12+1ast, M.Bukovszki 10+1reb+4ast, V.Szalay 10+1reb, D.Page 9+5reb+2ast, O.Zsovar 8+5reb+2ast, Z.Sonyak 8+2reb+2ast
Pecs 2010: D.Ivanyi 20+10reb+5ast, Z.Fegyverneky 17+8reb+3ast, K.Griffin 11+8reb+2ast, A.Quigley 11+5reb+4ast, S.Krnjic 11+6reb+1ast, N.Sarok 9+2reb
gschID: 125728

  PECS 201088
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 yRDFLRQjRVF, csIfai 48 0-7 (00.1%) 8-8 (655%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5 2 2 4 8 5 6 5 5 3 69 88 5
63 ruaDlRF, SllaR 82 6-4 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5-8 (5%) 5 0 0 3 8 5 8 5 5 5 66 61 5
84 GQaffaj, KRlsRF 89 0-2 (18.0%) 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 8 1 2 8 3 5 4 6 5 4 66 69 5
2 oLijFa, gilBi 81 1-2 (90%) 8-8 (655%) 8-8 (655%) 8 2 65 0 6 5 4 5 5 8 85 40 5
85 KQjnaZ, AiQi 61 4-4 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 0-1 (24.4%) 4 4 1 6 6 5 6 5 5 6 66 67 5
  Oilusji, eRDaji 61 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5 6 6 5 4 5 6 6 5 8 8 5 5
60 mundIsI, XIQi 60 6-0 (85%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 8 0 5 5 5 5 6 8 -1 5
7 AiQIV, XaVIlRUU 63 8-8 (655%) 6-6 (655%) 8-8 (655%) 5 8 8 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 7 66 5
0 eiVsijFa, KQasJUaji 63 5-4 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 6 -1 5
68 HIQLiUh, valli 0 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5
  KRllRQ, SjjiBiQai 0 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 6 5 -4 5
88 CJaQniV, XIRBa 8 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
wIUil   80-31 (03.3%) 2-66 (98.9%) 63-84 (15.7%) 7 44 38 67 81 5 66 8 5 61 22 652  


  ZTE65
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 muVILsJVa, bIjaVi 41 3-9 (09.6%) 5-8 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 3 3 5 8 5 5 6 65 7 5
  OiDR, gijaRllR 45 3-65 (35%) 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 3 0 8 5 5 8 6 5 6 7 65 5
2 csILiQ, PQsIlFi 89 6-3 (80%) 6-6 (655%) 4-3 (90%) 5 0 0 8 8 5 4 6 5 8 2 69 5
9 AJRlRsF, zudaU 81 0-66 (30.0%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 5 5 6 4 5 4 5 5 5 68 66 5
65 CJuVIQ, wujdR 84 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 0-1 (24.4%) 6 4 3 3 3 5 8 5 5 6 0 7 5
68 SBMQus, AJijdQi 84 6-3 (80%) 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 6 8 5 6 5 5 5 4 -6 5
64 AIjFiV, caUi 85 3-3 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 8 3 5 8 5 5 4 2 1 5
1 AJiliF, kaQiD 60 8-0 (35%) 5-6 (5%) 1-9 (20.9%) 6 5 6 5 3 5 4 5 5 8 65 2 5
0 GIUh, Gaji  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
3 guVia, SlRxijdQi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
60 bRsURQ, XaVIlRUUi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   86-32 (34.2%) 6-68 (2.4%) 85-80 (25.5%) 4 69 85 61 84 5 62 8 5 65 10 17  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)