Denmark

Regular Season Round 2: Lemvig - Falcon 73-62

Date: October 1, 2011
The game in Lemvig was also worth to mention about. Falcon (0-2) played at the court of Lemvig (1-1). Lemvig defeated Falcon 73-62. The game was mostly controlled by Lemvig. Falcon was better in fourth quarter 21-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. Lemvig had a 27-16 advantage in offensive rebounds. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 23 assists comparing to just 8 passes made by Falcon's players. The best player for the winners was forward Emely Hatch (-89) who had a double-double by scoring 30 points, 10 rebounds and 5 assists. American center Rebecca Kielpinski (188-89, college: Alaska-Anch.) chipped in a double-double by scoring 12 points and 10 rebounds. American center Trenice Fuller (193-87, college: Hofstra) produced 18 points and guard Elisabeth Hansen (176-93) added 14 points and 7 rebounds respectively for the guests. Falcon's coach Steffen Lund let to play ten players, but that didn't help to avoid defeat in this game. Lemvig's next round opponent will be league's second-placed Amager in Kastrup and it will be for sure the game of the week. Falcon will play on the road against Vaerlose.
Top scorers:
Lemvig: E.Hatch 30+10reb+5ast, R.Kielpinski 12+10reb+3ast, H.Kristiansen 10+2reb+1ast, H.Henriksen 8+6reb+3ast, B.Schelde 7+2reb+1ast, I.Udovalieva 4+2reb+9ast
Falcon: T.Fuller 18+4reb+3ast, E.Hansen 14+7reb+2ast, J.Abildgaard 7+5reb, C.Hansen 7+3reb+1ast, S.Amalou 4+1reb, E.Block-Frederiksen 4+1ast
gschID: 140467

  FALCON (coach: Agustin Espinola)62
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
60 yullRQ, wQRjaZR 49 7-60 (15%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 4 8 5 6 6 5 5 62 67 5
7 SMaldDiiQd, zulaR 44 4-9 (38.7%) 5-8 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 4 8 0 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 9 0 5
68 HijsRj, qlasiMRUh 82 6-8 (05%) 3-2 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8 0 9 8 6 5 8 5 5 4 63 61 5
64 HijsRj, ChiQlIUUR 88 8-1 (44.4%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 6 6 5 6 5 5 3 9 4 5
63 HRaMRQD, wIjR 88 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 4 4 5
2 mQIdRQsRj, ORQjallR 61 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 8 5 5 5 5 8 5 -0 5
66 ChQasURjsRj, bai 68 5-6 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 6 5 5 6 5 5 5 4 3 5
1 SBilIu, AiQih 66 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 5 5 6 5 5 8 3 8 5
0 mlIZV-yQRdRQaVsRj, qBBi 7 6-8 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 3 -6 5
65 GidRMRQD, biQaR 3 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 6 5
wIUil   67-38 (30.8%) 9-67 (41.2%) 4-3 (90.5%) 65 61 81 2 7 5 2 6 5 64 18 39  


  LEMVIG73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
9 HiUZh, qBRlF 41 68-61 (90%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-6 (5%) 6 7 65 0 6 5 6 5 5 5 45 47 5
3 tdILilaRLi, oLiji 44 8-3 (05%) 5-3 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 7 8 5 5 5 5 0 3 8 5
64 KaRlpajsVa, eRMRZZi 48 0-9 (96.3%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 2 65 4 4 5 6 8 5 0 68 69 5
1 HRjQaVsRj, HRlRjR 81 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 0 1 4 5 5 6 5 5 4 2 64 5
2 AZhRldR, mRQaU 81 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 4-0 (15%) 6 6 8 6 6 5 8 3 5 6 9 7 5
60 KQasUaijsRj, HRllR 88 8-3 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 6 6 5 6 5 5 6 65 65 5
65 ORdRQsRj, vIuasR 65 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
63 KQasUaijsRj, wajR 9 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 5
7 HijsRj, Xijji 4 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 -8 5
0 gRZaZ, bRdaji  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   82-34 (10.6%) 3-66 (41.3%) 0-2 (18.0%) 1 89 44 84 66 5 1 1 5 61 94 27  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)