Denmark

Regular Season Round 21: Falcon - Lemvig 74-88

Date: March 10, 2012
The game in Falcon was also quite interesting. Sixth ranked Lemvig (7-14) played at the court of 8th ranked Falcon (4-17). Lemvig defeated Falcon 88-74 on Saturday. The game was mostly controlled by Lemvig. Falcon managed to win second period 18-15. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. Lemvig shot 25 for 34 from the free-throw line, while Falcon only scored two points from the stripe. Lemvig had a 28-17 advantage in offensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists. Forward Emely Hatch (-89) stepped up with a double-double by scoring 30 points and 13 rebounds for the winners and American center Rebecca Kielpinski (188-89, college: Alaska-Anch.) chipped in 23 points and 5 rebounds. The best for the losing side was guard Elisabeth Hansen (176-93) with 34 points (!!!) and 6 rebounds and American center Trenice Fuller (193-87, college: Hofstra) produced a double-double by scoring 20 points, 13 rebounds and 4 assists. Falcon's coach Steffen Lund tested ten players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Lemvig moved-up to fifth place. Falcon lost their eighth game in a row. They stay at the bottom position with 17 games lost.
Top scorers:
Falcon: E.Hansen 34+6reb, T.Fuller 20+13reb+4ast, C.Hansen 6+4reb+1ast, E.Block-Frederiksen 5+1reb, F.Christensen 3+1ast, P.Brodersen 2+1reb
Lemvig: E.Hatch 30+13reb+3ast, R.Kielpinski 23+5reb+1ast, I.Udovalieva 12+3reb+10ast, N.Hansen 6, B.Schelde 6+3reb+6ast, H.Henriksen 4+4reb
gschID: 140544

  FALCON (coach: Agustin Espinola)74
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
68 HijsRj, qlasiMRUh 40 65-61 (18.0%) 3-9 (09.6%) 8-8 (655%) 3 8 1 5 8 5 8 5 5 0 43 81 5
60 yullRQ, wQRjaZR 40 65-69 (02.2%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 65 64 3 0 5 8 4 5 6 85 87 5
64 HijsRj, ChiQlIUUR 80 4-1 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 8 3 6 3 5 6 5 5 8 1 8 5
0 mlIZV-yQRdRQaVsRj, qBBi 88 6-8 (05%) 6-9 (63.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 4 5 6 5 5 8 0 -0 5
3 KlajU, qBalaR 85 6-7 (66.6%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 5 4 4 6 5 4 5 5 8 8 -8 5
66 ChQasURjsRj, bai 69 6-6 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 4 8 5 4 5 5 5 8 1 5
2 mQIdRQsRj, ORQjallR 60 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 0 5 6 5 5 5 8 -6 5
1 ChQasURjsRj, yQRni 68 5-6 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 4 -6 5
7 GidRMRQD, biQaR 66 5-3 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 -3 5
63 HRaMRQD, wIjR 8 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 5
wIUil   89-09 (39.3%) 1-88 (89.4%) 8-8 (655.5%) 64 69 45 63 89 5 64 4 5 64 93 32  


  LEMVIG88
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 tdILilaRLi, oLiji 41 4-0 (15%) 5-4 (5%) 1-1 (655%) 5 4 4 65 5 5 6 5 5 1 68 60 5
64 KaRlpajsVa, eRMRZZi 48 0-2 (18.0%) 4-3 (90%) 3-0 (25%) 5 0 0 6 4 5 6 6 5 4 84 85 5
9 HiUZh, qBRlF 46 66-69 (13.9%) 5-5 (5%) 2-66 (98.9%) 4 65 64 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 45 87 5
2 AZhRldR, mRQaU 46 6-3 (80%) 5-6 (5%) 3-2 (05%) 6 8 4 1 8 5 4 5 5 4 1 0 5
1 HRjQaVsRj, HRlRjR 88 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 3 0 5
60 KQasUaijsRj, HRllR 86 6-8 (05%) 5-8 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 0 0 5 5 5 8 5 5 8 4 3 5
63 KQasUaijsRj, wajR 64 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 6 5 6 6 6 5 6 5 5 6 3 0 5
7 HijsRj, Xijji 7 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 5
wIUil   83-35 (15.5%) 0-68 (36.9%) 80-43 (94.0%) 1 82 43 86 68 5 2 6 5 67 22 27  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)