Germany

Regular Season Round 21: Chemnitz - Hanau 91-73

Date: February 6, 2016
The game between tenth ranked BV Chemnitz 99 (10-11) and 12th ranked White Wings (8-13) in Chemnitz ended with biggest points difference. BV Chemnitz 99 beat guests from Hanau 91-73. BV Chemnitz 99 made 22-of-29 charity shots (75.9 percent) during the game. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 27 assists. 27 personal fouls committed by White Wings helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. American players dominated the game. The best player for the winners was forward Nate Buss (206-92, college: N.Iowa, agency: SPORTlab Agency) who scored 22 points and 9 rebounds. Point guard Virgil Matthews (188-83, college: Montana, agency: Court Side) chipped in 16 points, 6 rebounds and 8 assists. Five BV Chemnitz 99 players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was guard Luke Loucks (196-90, college: Florida St.) who recorded 15 points and 6 rebounds and guard Miles Jackson-Cartwright (190-92, college: Pennsylvania) added 8 points, 6 rebounds and 5 assists respectively. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. BV Chemnitz 99 maintains tenth place with 10-11 record. Newly promoted White Wings keep the twelfth position with 13 games lost. BV Chemnitz 99's next round opponent will be bottom-ranked Dragons Rhoendorf (#16) on the road which should be theoretically an easy game. White Wings will play against Oettinger Rockets Gotha (#4) and hope to win that game.

  CHEMNITZ (coach: Rodrigo Pastore)91
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
63 muss, XiUR 43 8-0 (35%) 3-1 (11.9%) 1-1 (655%) 5 7 7 4 8 5 5 8 5 4 88 81 5
3 biUUhRTs, kaQDal 44 1-7 (11.9%) 6-6 (655%) 6-6 (655%) 5 1 1 2 4 5 4 5 5 3 61 84 5
44 vIDajs, GQRD 48 3-65 (35%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 9 9 1 8 5 6 5 5 8 66 64 5
68 CiQdRjis, eIMRQU 86 3-3 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 4-1 (05%) 5 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 6 66 2 5
1 baxaZh, gijaRl 86 5-5 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 0 4 5 8 5 5 6 5 5 5
66 ARafRQUh, biQUaj 67 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 5 9 9 6 5 5 5 4 5 5 0 64 5
84 WaDDajs, gishiuj 62 4-0 (15%) 6-6 (655%) 4-3 (90%) 5 6 6 8 8 5 5 5 5 8 68 2 5
9 eaZhURQ, zIjis 7 6-8 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 8 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5
64 mRllsZhRadU, HRjdQaV 9 6-6 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 8 8 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 8 5
0 yluRllRj, KRjjF 1 6-6 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 3-3 (655%) 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 1 1 5
4 WalsIj, AUiZF  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   83-47 (16.0%) 9-67 (41.2%) 88-87 (90.7%) 5 49 49 89 61 5 1 0 5 63 76 658  


  HANAU73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
44 ChQasURj, eIMaj 89 4-0 (15%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 3 4 5 8 5 5 6 1 9 5
89 LIj yajURl, ChQasUaij 81 6-3 (80%) 4-7 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 6 3 5 4 6 5 6 66 3 5
00 vIuZVs, vuVR 80 4-1 (05%) 8-1 (44.4%) 4-4 (655%) 5 1 1 8 8 5 6 5 5 6 60 63 5
9 qaZhlRQ, zIsRf 84 6-8 (05%) 3-9 (09.6%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 8 4 5 5 5 5 6 63 66 5
4 ziZVsIj-CiQUTQaDhU, balRs 88 6-7 (66.6%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5 1 1 0 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 3 5
61 AZhiffQiUh, zIlRaV 67 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 0 5 6 5 5 6 3 5 5
05 zIhjsIj, gijR 62 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 0-0 (655%) 5 0 0 5 3 5 5 5 5 6 9 0 5
0 bRsDhji, zIjiUhij 62 6-6 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 8 8 6 3 5 5 5 5 6 3 5 5
2 HRZV, ARMisUaij 68 8-8 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 8 5
60 OajVajs, KQuaJR 65 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 8 5 6 5 5 8 5 -3 5
wIUil   60-47 (42.0%) 65-48 (46.4%) 64-60 (21.9%) 5 43 43 60 89 5 2 6 5 64 94 34  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)