Romania

Second Stage Round 5: Cluj Napoca - Satu Mare 63-73

Date: February 8, 2020
The game in Cluj Napoca was also worth to mention about. Second ranked Satu Mare (7-2) played at the court of 5th ranked Cluj Napoca (2-9). Satu Mare defeated Cluj Napoca 73-63. The game was mostly controlled by Satu Mare. Cluj Napoca was better in second period 12-10. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They made 18-of-22 charity shots (81.8 percent) during the game. American Bernice Mosby (186-84, college: Baylor) orchestrated the victory by scoring 19 points, 9 rebounds and 5 assists. Her fellow American import forward Lauren Ervin (191-85, college: Arkansas) contributed with a double-double by scoring 17 points and 12 rebounds for the winners. Four Satu Mare players scored in double figures. American forward Korinne Campbell (184-88, college: WVU) answered with a double-double by scoring 17 points, 16 rebounds and 6 assists and international point guard Tunde Kilin (171-91) added 18 points in the effort for Cluj Napoca. Satu Mare maintains second place with 7-2 record having four points less than leader Targu Secuiesc. Cluj Napoca at the other side keeps the fifth position with nine games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.

  CLUJ NAPOCA (coach: Ioannis Koukos)63
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
0 Kalaj, wujdR 42 8-9 (82.1%) 3-7 (33.3%) 8-8 (655%) 6 8 4 4 3 6 8 5 5 8 62 66 -2
5 CiBpMRll, KIQajjR 49 9-85 (40%) 5-5 (5%) 4-0 (15%) 2 2 61 1 8 3 5 5 6 6 69 83 -4
60 KajD, biQaih 87 8-1 (44.4%) 6-4 (44.4%) 0-9 (96.3%) 6 9 2 8 3 9 6 5 5 6 68 69 -67
1 yIUi, maijZi 89 8-7 (88.8%) 6-9 (63.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 8 4 8 4 6 6 6 9 6 6
9 ylRsRQ, SjdQRRi 80 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 4 4 5 6 5 6 6 4 6 -69
86 mIlIja, XIRBa 67 6-8 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 8 8 -3 -8
2 yIUi, gRjasi 62 6-0 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 4 6 8 6 5 5 8 -6 65
68 AUIaZi, maijZi 4 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 8 6 -68
65 XRiDu, wRIdIQi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
69 tauau, SlRxijdQi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   61-04 (45.8%) 9-88 (46.2%) 65-63 (96.3%) 66 84 43 61 86 60 7 8 4 7 14 05  


  SATU MARE73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
5 bIsMF, mRQjaZR 42 0-60 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 7-68 (90%) 6 2 7 0 3 65 8 4 6 4 67 81 65
66 yRQRjZJa, yliLai 42 8-4 (11.9%) 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 6 1 9 1 8 4 8 5 5 4 7 85 65
33 qQLaj, viuQRj 49 3-9 (09.6%) 8-8 (655%) 4-4 (655%) 3 2 68 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 69 83 65
9 Plih, SjdQRRi 49 4-0 (15%) 6-2 (68.0%) 8-8 (655%) 5 1 1 8 5 6 6 5 6 8 66 7 4
84 OIdiQ, Slaji 82 4-0 (15%) 4-0 (15%) 6-6 (655%) 5 0 0 4 4 4 5 5 5 8 61 62 60
4 OIpRsZu, CiQli 7 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 5 6 6 5 8 5 5 5 6 6 6 -3
62 KidiQ, SjiBiQai 0 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 1
06 HuUiju, SjdQRRi 4 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -4 5
86 AUIaRdaj, Sdaji  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
7 AJBuUVu, eRjiUi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
60 CQIaUIQu, Sjasai  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   69-49 (31.5%) 9-85 (40.5%) 62-88 (26.2%) 9 44 35 85 60 86 0 4 8 60 94 74  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)