Ukraine
Regular Season Round 36: BIPA O. - Khimik-2 97-62
Date: March 29, 2021
We could consider it a predictable result in the game between close teams in Odessa where fourth ranked BIPA O. (16-10) outleveled one of their biggest challengers Khimik-2 (17-9) 97-62 on Monday. The game was mostly controlled by BIPA O.. Khimik-2 was better in second period 20-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded Khimik-2 39-27 including a 31-19 advantage in defensive rebounds. BIPA O. looked well-organized offensively handing out 29 assists comparing to just 15 passes made by Khimik-2's players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when BIPA O. made 7 blocks. Worth to mention a great performance of American guard Randy Haynes (193-95, college: ODU) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 21 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists and the other American import center Joshua Patton (203, college: Sacramento St.) who added 12 points and 8 rebounds during the contest. The best for the losing side was forward Nikita Bezyma (193-1) with 8 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists and swingman Vitaliy Shorstkiy (195-0) scored 10 points. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. BIPA O. have a solid three-game winning streak. Newly promoted BIPA O. maintains fourth position with 16-10 record. Khimik-2 lost third consecutive game. They keep the third place with nine games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 36: BIPA O. - Khimik-2 97-62
Date: March 29, 2021
We could consider it a predictable result in the game between close teams in Odessa where fourth ranked BIPA O. (16-10) outleveled one of their biggest challengers Khimik-2 (17-9) 97-62 on Monday. The game was mostly controlled by BIPA O.. Khimik-2 was better in second period 20-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded Khimik-2 39-27 including a 31-19 advantage in defensive rebounds. BIPA O. looked well-organized offensively handing out 29 assists comparing to just 15 passes made by Khimik-2's players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when BIPA O. made 7 blocks. Worth to mention a great performance of American guard Randy Haynes (193-95, college: ODU) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 21 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists and the other American import center Joshua Patton (203, college: Sacramento St.) who added 12 points and 8 rebounds during the contest. The best for the losing side was forward Nikita Bezyma (193-1) with 8 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists and swingman Vitaliy Shorstkiy (195-0) scored 10 points. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. BIPA O. have a solid three-game winning streak. Newly promoted BIPA O. maintains fourth position with 16-10 record. Khimik-2 lost third consecutive game. They keep the third place with nine games lost.
 BIPA O. (coach: Oleksandr Ryabchuk)97 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 45 | OiUUIj, zIshui | 44 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 63 | 80 |
| 67 | AIlILFIL, PlRxaF | 87 | 6-8 (05%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 69 | 89 |
| 68 | HiFjRs, eijdF | 89 | 4-1 (05%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 7 | 65 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 86 | 46 | 84 |
| 46 | yuQs, PlRxijdQ | 67 | 3-0 (25%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 67 | 85 |
| 64 | wViZhRjVI, qLDRja | 61 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 7 | 86 |
| 9 | eRLJaj, OiLRl | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 62 |
| 49 | kIlZhijIL, bFVhiFlI | 69 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 61 |
| 66 | AIlILRa, gBFUQI | 64 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 69 |
| 65 | ChRlILij, SjiUIlF | 68 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 68 |
| 33 | OijfalIL, KaQal | 9 | 6-8 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 68 | 3 |
| 6 | busUaiUsi, klidFsliL | 9 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | -8 | -3 |
| 83 | ciDQRMi, ARQDaF | 1 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | -3 |
| wIUil | 83-47 (16.0%) | 63-48 (34.2%) | 9-63 (05.5%) | 2 | 46 | 47 | 87 | 64 | 5 | 69 | 9 | 5 | 68 | 79 | 683 | |||
 KHIMIK-262 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 89 | KlRMij, gBFUQI | 82 | 6-3 (80%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 8 | -87 |
| 60 | mRJFBi, XaVaUi | 82 | 3-66 (41.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 68 | -67 |
| 62 | oLishIL, euslij | 81 | 4-0 (15%) | 8-7 (88.8%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 7 | -67 |
| 80 | baUQaZh, bFVhiFlI | 80 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -83 |
| 6 | AhiLDiQIL, olaFi | 86 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 8 | -84 |
| 65 | AhIQsUVaF, kaUilaF | 80 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 65 | 7 | -88 |
| 46 | OQIViZhIL, SQsRjaF | 60 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -3 |
| 4 | KILilZhuV, oLij | 68 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | -61 |
| 66 | ORUQRjVI, SlRxijdRQ | 66 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 81 | AhIQsUVaF, euslij | 2 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | -66 |
| 9 | AVuUFRljaV, KFQFlI | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | -2 |
| 7 | gIsFuV, bixaB | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 62-47 (31.8%) | 1-89 (88.8%) | 2-68 (11.9%) | 2 | 67 | 89 | 60 | 62 | 5 | 65 | 4 | 5 | 69 | 18 | 41 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#12 RANDY HAYNES
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #15 NIKITA BEZYMA
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
