Romania
Regular Season Round 8: Cluj Napoca - Miercurea Ciuc 96-65
Date: December 3, 2022
There was no surprise when 8th ranked Miercurea Ciuc (2-5) was crushed on the road by top-ranked Cluj Napoca (7-0) 96-65 on Saturday. The game without a history. Cluj Napoca led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Cluj Napoca forced 30 Miercurea Ciuc turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 28 assists comparing to just 12 passes made by Miercurea Ciuc's players. Worth to mention a great performance of Brazilian Leonardo Meindl (201-1993) who helped to win the game recording 22 points and 4 assists and the former international Nandor Kuti (196-1997) who added 11 points and 4 assists during the contest. The former international forward Amedeo Casale (194-1997, agency: BIG) responded with 13 points and 6 assists and Canadian Meshack Lufile (203-1992, college: Cape Breton) scored 16 points (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Cluj Napoca have an impressive seven-game winning streak. Defending champion maintains first position with 7-0 record. Loser Miercurea Ciuc dropped to the seventh place with five games lost. They share the position with Focsani and Targu Mures. Cluj Napoca will meet Targu Mures (#9) on the road in the next round and are hoping to win another game. Miercurea Ciuc will play against Pitesti and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 8: Cluj Napoca - Miercurea Ciuc 96-65
Date: December 3, 2022
There was no surprise when 8th ranked Miercurea Ciuc (2-5) was crushed on the road by top-ranked Cluj Napoca (7-0) 96-65 on Saturday. The game without a history. Cluj Napoca led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Cluj Napoca forced 30 Miercurea Ciuc turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 28 assists comparing to just 12 passes made by Miercurea Ciuc's players. Worth to mention a great performance of Brazilian Leonardo Meindl (201-1993) who helped to win the game recording 22 points and 4 assists and the former international Nandor Kuti (196-1997) who added 11 points and 4 assists during the contest. The former international forward Amedeo Casale (194-1997, agency: BIG) responded with 13 points and 6 assists and Canadian Meshack Lufile (203-1992, college: Cape Breton) scored 16 points (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Cluj Napoca have an impressive seven-game winning streak. Defending champion maintains first position with 7-0 record. Loser Miercurea Ciuc dropped to the seventh place with five games lost. They share the position with Focsani and Targu Mures. Cluj Napoca will meet Targu Mures (#9) on the road in the next round and are hoping to win another game. Miercurea Ciuc will play against Pitesti and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
 CLUJ NAPOCA (coach: Mihai Silvasan)96 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 0 | vipusUR, giLad | 82 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 69 |
| 2 | KuUa, XijdIQ | 81 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 61 | 60 |
| 5 | GuJBij, KiQRl | 81 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-3 (80%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 69 | 82 |
| 84 | bRajdl, vRIjiQdI | 88 | 4-4 (655%) | 0-7 (00.1%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 88 | 87 | 2 |
| 7 | eIsZhjifsVF, qduiQd | 88 | 3-0 (25%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 63 | 62 |
| 60 | CiUR, qBijuRl | 88 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 65 | 0 |
| 63 | maQZRLaZ, AURfij | 69 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-0 (35%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 64 | 65 |
| 40 | eaZhiQd, OiUQaZV | 60 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 61 |
| 64 | AUapijILaZ, SjdQani | 63 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 85 |
| 62 | gaiMF, bIdaMI | 1 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| 3 | AJRjUVuUa, SVIs | 1 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| 65 | GIQdaZ, XRBijni | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 81-38 (16.7%) | 66-46 (40.0%) | 66-67 (09.7%) | 7 | 67 | 82 | 82 | 86 | 69 | 85 | 6 | 8 | 60 | 71 | 652 | |||
 MIERCUREA CIUC65 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | CisilR, SBRdRI | 45 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-8 (5%) | 9-2 (29.0%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 64 | 65 | -64 |
| 0 | bijInlILaZ, XRBijni | 87 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 65 | 0 | -62 |
| 68 | vufalR, bRshiZV | 81 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 67 | -62 |
| 1 | AUijRsZu, CRJiQ | 81 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 | -4 | -81 |
| 64 | yQIlIL, klidasliL | 80 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 65 | -68 |
| 9 | CuZILaZ, HiQas | 80 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 9 | -83 |
| 85 | waMaQji, vuZaij | 68 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | -1 |
| 77 | cRQVuli, cIlUij | 68 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -61 |
| 88 | gQisVILaZ, SjdQani | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | -1 |
| 66 | visJlI, SQjIld | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | -9 |
| 99 | AJiMI, vRhRl | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | -9 |
| 45 | visJlI, mIUIjd | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | -8 |
| wIUil | 86-36 (06.8%) | 6-1 (61.9%) | 85-87 (17.5%) | 3 | 84 | 89 | 68 | 69 | 86 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 45 | 10 | 03 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOP PERFORMANCE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEONARDO MEINDL
|
 |
MESHACK LUFILE
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
