Romania
Second Stage Round 9: Cluj Napoca - Constanta 90-59
Date: April 1, 2023
No shocking result in a game when second ranked Cluj Napoca (15-3) smashed at home 10th ranked Constanta (4-14) 90-59 on Saturday. The hosts trailed by 1 point after first quarter, but they stormed back to get the 11-point lead at the halftime and eventually won the game 90-59. Cluj Napoca dominated on the defensive end, holding Constanta to just 5 points in third quarter. They dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to Constanta's 24 and made 16-of-21 free shots (76.2 percent) during the game. Cluj Napoca looked well-organized offensively handing out 28 assists comparing to just 13 passes made by Constanta's players. The former international center Emanuel Cate (207-1997) stepped up and scored 21 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks for the winners and Serbian Stefan Bircevic (210-1989, agency: BIG) chipped in 18 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Four Cluj Napoca players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American point guard Nate Johnson (193-1998, college: Xavier) with 12 points and 5 rebounds and Slovenian swingman Jakob Cebasek (200-1991) scored 14 points and 4 assists. Constanta's coach Alexandru Olteanu gave up on the game allowing to play ten players seeing no chance for a win. Defending champion maintains second place with 15-3 record behind leader Ploiesti CSM. Loser Constanta keeps the tenth position with 14 games lost. Cluj Napoca will meet Voluntari (#4) on the road in the next round. Constanta will play against Sibiu (#5) and hope to secure a win.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Second Stage Round 9: Cluj Napoca - Constanta 90-59
Date: April 1, 2023
No shocking result in a game when second ranked Cluj Napoca (15-3) smashed at home 10th ranked Constanta (4-14) 90-59 on Saturday. The hosts trailed by 1 point after first quarter, but they stormed back to get the 11-point lead at the halftime and eventually won the game 90-59. Cluj Napoca dominated on the defensive end, holding Constanta to just 5 points in third quarter. They dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to Constanta's 24 and made 16-of-21 free shots (76.2 percent) during the game. Cluj Napoca looked well-organized offensively handing out 28 assists comparing to just 13 passes made by Constanta's players. The former international center Emanuel Cate (207-1997) stepped up and scored 21 points, 6 rebounds and 4 blocks for the winners and Serbian Stefan Bircevic (210-1989, agency: BIG) chipped in 18 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Four Cluj Napoca players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American point guard Nate Johnson (193-1998, college: Xavier) with 12 points and 5 rebounds and Slovenian swingman Jakob Cebasek (200-1991) scored 14 points and 4 assists. Constanta's coach Alexandru Olteanu gave up on the game allowing to play ten players seeing no chance for a win. Defending champion maintains second place with 15-3 record behind leader Ploiesti CSM. Loser Constanta keeps the tenth position with 14 games lost. Cluj Napoca will meet Voluntari (#4) on the road in the next round. Constanta will play against Sibiu (#5) and hope to secure a win.
 CLUJ NAPOCA (coach: Mihai Silvasan)90 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 63 | maQZRLaZ, AURfij | 45 | 4-4 (655%) | 4-0 (15%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 62 | 81 | 83 |
| 2 | KuUa, XijdIQ | 82 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 61 |
| 8 | AhRphRQd, KisRF | 81 | 0-0 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 89 | 83 |
| 60 | CiUR, qBijuRl | 83 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 86 | 82 | 85 |
| 84 | bRajdl, vRIjiQdI | 84 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 69 |
| 40 | eaZhiQd, OiUQaZV | 88 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 0-0 (655%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 46 |
| 64 | AUapijILaZ, SjdQani | 85 | 9-66 (14.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 63 | 7 | 62 |
| 65 | GIQdaZ, XRBijni | 85 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| 0 | vipusUR, giLad | 65 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | -6 | 6 |
| wIUil | 82-36 (12.4%) | 1-86 (82.1%) | 61-86 (91.8%) | 0 | 46 | 41 | 82 | 84 | 85 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 63 | 75 | 661 | |||
 CONSTANTA59 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 65 | zIhjsIj, XiUR | 44 | 4-65 (45%) | 5-0 (5%) | 1-1 (655%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 65 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 68 | 65 | -89 |
| 00 | CRMisRV, ziVIM | 87 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 4-4 (655%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 63 | 60 | -89 |
| 44 | CIQpIdRij, klid | 87 | 5-3 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 0 | -61 |
| 0 | bIZVRLaZaus, qDadanus | 80 | 3-65 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 2 | 65 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 7 | -69 |
| 1 | biajRi, AURfij | 67 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | -6 | -69 |
| 62 | SdQaij, eidulRsZu | 69 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -4 | -1 |
| 9 | PpQRij, SjdQRa | 61 | 5-5 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 2 | -69 |
| 49 | viJiQ, biQaI | 63 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 65 | -9 |
| 80 | oLijiusVis, eipIlis | 63 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -1 | -62 |
| 99 | milij, kaUilaR | 65 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | -6 | -4 |
| 88 | CaJiusVis, kFURjas | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 68-49 (48.3%) | 9-89 (80.7%) | 63-62 (99.2%) | 66 | 84 | 43 | 64 | 85 | 84 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 61 | 07 | 31 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#15 EMANUEL CATE
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #55 JAKOB CEBASEK
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
