Hungary
Regular Season Round 5: Pecs 2010 - Atomeromu 92-70
Date: October 19, 2011
The game had a very big importance for third-ranked Pecs 2010 as it allowed them to take a leadership position. Pecs 2010 smashed bottom-ranked Atomeromu at home 92-70. The game was mostly controlled by Pecs 2010. Atomeromu managed to win fourth quarter 22-13. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They made 27-of-32 free shots (84.4 percent) during the game. Pecs 2010 forced 22 Atomeromu turnovers and outrebounded them 38-26 including 27 on the defensive glass. 28 personal fouls committed by Atomeromu helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. American guard Allie Quigley (180-86, college: De Paul) stepped up and scored 19 points and 5 rebounds for the winners and forward Lilla Horvath (182-90, agency: Laszlo Vinko Group) chipped in 12 points and 8 rebounds. International forward Reka Fejes (186-87, agency: Laszlo Vinko Group) responded with 11 points and 6 rebounds and forward Reka Balint (182-91) scored 16 points and 5 steals. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Pecs 2010 (5-0) have an impressive series of five victories in a row. As mentioned above they are at the top of the standings, which they share with 3 other teams. Atomeromu at the other side still closes the standings with five games lost. They share the position with 3 other teams. Atomeromu will play next round against BSE-FCSM trying to get back on the winning streak. Pecs 2010 will try to continue on its current victory against twelfth ranked BEAC-Ujbuda in Budapest.
Top scorers:
Atomeromu: R.Balint 16, R.Fejes 11+6reb+1ast, B.Baksa 9+4reb, M.Cvetanovic 8+3reb+1ast, T.Licina 8+2reb+2ast, D.Zele 6+3reb
Pecs 2010: A.Quigley 19+5reb, L.Murphy 16+4reb, L.Horvath 12+8reb+3ast, A.Pilav 9+5reb, A.Szamosi 9+7reb, E.Laczi 8+2reb+1ast
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 5: Pecs 2010 - Atomeromu 92-70
Date: October 19, 2011
The game had a very big importance for third-ranked Pecs 2010 as it allowed them to take a leadership position. Pecs 2010 smashed bottom-ranked Atomeromu at home 92-70. The game was mostly controlled by Pecs 2010. Atomeromu managed to win fourth quarter 22-13. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They made 27-of-32 free shots (84.4 percent) during the game. Pecs 2010 forced 22 Atomeromu turnovers and outrebounded them 38-26 including 27 on the defensive glass. 28 personal fouls committed by Atomeromu helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. American guard Allie Quigley (180-86, college: De Paul) stepped up and scored 19 points and 5 rebounds for the winners and forward Lilla Horvath (182-90, agency: Laszlo Vinko Group) chipped in 12 points and 8 rebounds. International forward Reka Fejes (186-87, agency: Laszlo Vinko Group) responded with 11 points and 6 rebounds and forward Reka Balint (182-91) scored 16 points and 5 steals. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Pecs 2010 (5-0) have an impressive series of five victories in a row. As mentioned above they are at the top of the standings, which they share with 3 other teams. Atomeromu at the other side still closes the standings with five games lost. They share the position with 3 other teams. Atomeromu will play next round against BSE-FCSM trying to get back on the winning streak. Pecs 2010 will try to continue on its current victory against twelfth ranked BEAC-Ujbuda in Budapest.
Top scorers:
Atomeromu: R.Balint 16, R.Fejes 11+6reb+1ast, B.Baksa 9+4reb, M.Cvetanovic 8+3reb+1ast, T.Licina 8+2reb+2ast, D.Zele 6+3reb
Pecs 2010: A.Quigley 19+5reb, L.Murphy 16+4reb, L.Horvath 12+8reb+3ast, A.Pilav 9+5reb, A.Szamosi 9+7reb, E.Laczi 8+2reb+1ast
 ATOMEROMU (coach: Bianka Magyar)70 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| milajU, eRVi | 45 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 61 | 69 | 5 | |
| yRnRs, eRVi | 80 | 3-65 (35%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 66 | 5 | |
| miVsi, mRUUaji | 80 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 | |
| vaZaji, wijni | 84 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-0 (35%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| CLRUijILaZ, balaZi | 88 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| AJRBRQRda, KQasJUaji | 69 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 64 | gRBRURQ, SjaUi | 61 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| 85 | bRdDFRssF, gIQi | 60 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-2 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| cRlR, gIQaji | 68 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 2 | Hindu, csijRUU | 9 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| Oip, eRDaji | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 69 | AUudRQ, csuJsijji | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 86-31 (30.9%) | 8-2 (80.5%) | 88-46 (96.5%) | 9 | 67 | 81 | 2 | 82 | 5 | 60 | 8 | 5 | 88 | 95 | 16 | |||
 PECS 201092 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| OaliL, Sadi | 81 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 5 | |
| 0 | eiVsijFa, KQasJUaji | 84 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 68 | HIQLiUh, valli | 85 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 86 | 5 |
| 7 | AiQIV, XaVIlRUU | 85 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| ruaDlRF, SllaR | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-0 (15%) | 1-1 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 81 | 5 | |
| buQphF, vFjj | 62 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 67 | 5 | |
| 80 | AJiBIsa, SBidRi | 61 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| viZJa, qdaU | 61 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| wIQIV, AJalLai | 63 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 5 | |
| CsuUIQis, yijja | 68 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | |
| ORjJRs, KajDi | 65 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | -3 | 5 | |
| milli, gIQIUUFi | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -4 | 5 | |
| wIUil | 82-05 (01.5%) | 4-60 (85.5%) | 89-48 (23.3%) | 66 | 89 | 42 | 68 | 45 | 5 | 62 | 5 | 5 | 69 | 78 | 77 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
