Euroleague
Regular Season Round 8: Khimky - Cantu 77-53
Date: November 29, 2012
Khimky made a big step towards EuroLeague Last 16 stage. They knocked down visiting Mapooro Cantu to improve at 5-3 record in Group A. Zoran Planinic and Paul Davis accounted for 14 points each to pace the hosts. Cantu fell at 2-6 record after the loss. Cantu started strong with Manuchar Markoishvili orchestrating the show. The Georgian player fired 12 points in the opening quarter as Cantu gained a 24:23 lead. Khimky tipped off the second term with 7 points in a row to surge ahead. They later took control with a 10:1 run and posted a 44:31 halftime lead. Sergey Monya and Vitaliy Fridzon made it 52:33 for the hosts early in the third term. Khimky did not slow down and recorded a 62:43 advantage into the final stanza. Khimky never looked back afterwards coasting to the win. Vitaliy Fridzon and Sergey Monya finished with 11 points each for the hosts. Manuchar Markoishvili answered with 16 points for Cantu. Maarten Leunen had 11 points in the loss.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 8: Khimky - Cantu 77-53
Date: November 29, 2012
Khimky made a big step towards EuroLeague Last 16 stage. They knocked down visiting Mapooro Cantu to improve at 5-3 record in Group A. Zoran Planinic and Paul Davis accounted for 14 points each to pace the hosts. Cantu fell at 2-6 record after the loss. Cantu started strong with Manuchar Markoishvili orchestrating the show. The Georgian player fired 12 points in the opening quarter as Cantu gained a 24:23 lead. Khimky tipped off the second term with 7 points in a row to surge ahead. They later took control with a 10:1 run and posted a 44:31 halftime lead. Sergey Monya and Vitaliy Fridzon made it 52:33 for the hosts early in the third term. Khimky did not slow down and recorded a 62:43 advantage into the final stanza. Khimky never looked back afterwards coasting to the win. Vitaliy Fridzon and Sergey Monya finished with 11 points each for the hosts. Manuchar Markoishvili answered with 16 points for Cantu. Maarten Leunen had 11 points in the loss.
 CANTU (coach: Frank Vitucci)53 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | biQVIashLala, bijuZhiQ | 45 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 61 | 63 | 5 |
| 65 | vRujRj, biiQURj | 45 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 63 | 5 |
| 61 | wFus, SlRx | 89 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| 62 | wiMu, zIjiUhij | 89 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 60 | mQIIVs, zRff | 81 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 65 | 7 | 5 |
| 68 | biJJiQajI, XaZIlis | 86 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 0 | SMiss, STudu | 67 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 88 | Cusaj, biQZI | 68 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | KudliZRV, ziVuM | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 64 | CisRlli, SjdQRi | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 69-42 (33.9%) | 4-69 (69.9%) | 65-61 (18.0%) | 9 | 67 | 81 | 66 | 68 | 67 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 04 | 37 | |||
 KHIMKY (coach: Gleb Plotnikov)77 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 43 | OlijajaZ, cIQij | 80 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 63 | 85 | 5 |
| 68 | bIjFi, ARQDRF | 83 | 6-3 (80%) | 4-0 (15%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 64 | 5 |
| 66 | eaLRQs, K.C. | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 65 | 5 |
| 33 | XaRlsRj, biUU | 86 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 35 | giLas, Oiul | 85 | 1-68 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 63 | 65 | 5 |
| 9 | yQadJIj, kaUilaF | 67 | 6-8 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 60 | 5 |
| 0 | SuDusUajR, ziBRs | 62 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 65 | vIjZiQ, KQRsaBaQ | 60 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| 7 | kFilUsRL, qDIQ | 63 | 6-0 (85%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 64 | KhLIsUIL, gBaUQF | 63 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 86 | chuVijRjVI, SlRxRF | 4 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 83 | gudu, mRjniBaj-OiLRl | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 86-38 (05.5%) | 65-61 (18.0%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 7 | 86 | 45 | 80 | 67 | 68 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 64 | 99 | 78 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
