Eurocup
Top 32 Round 5: N.Novgorod - Panionios 80-67
Date: February 12, 2014
Nizhny Novgorod recorded the fifth victory in EuroCup Group L. They outscored Panionios at home court to stay on top of the standings. Dijon Thompson scored 19 points, grabbed 11 rebounds and issued 4 assists to lead the winning side. Nizhny Novgorod poured in 24 points in the opening quarter. They built an 11-point advantage after ten minutes. Panionios narrowed the gap in the second frame. The Hellenes got within 8 points at the interval 35:43. Panionios stayed aggressive throughout the third term. The visitors pulled within 7 points at the final intermission 50:57. Nizhny Novgorod scored 23 points in the fourth frame and sealed the winning outcome. Petr Gubanov chipped in 16 points, while Semen Antonov had 10 points for Nizhny Novgorod. Errick McCollum responded with 22 points for Panionios. Marc Antonio Carter had 9 points in the defeat.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Top 32 Round 5: N.Novgorod - Panionios 80-67
Date: February 12, 2014
Nizhny Novgorod recorded the fifth victory in EuroCup Group L. They outscored Panionios at home court to stay on top of the standings. Dijon Thompson scored 19 points, grabbed 11 rebounds and issued 4 assists to lead the winning side. Nizhny Novgorod poured in 24 points in the opening quarter. They built an 11-point advantage after ten minutes. Panionios narrowed the gap in the second frame. The Hellenes got within 8 points at the interval 35:43. Panionios stayed aggressive throughout the third term. The visitors pulled within 7 points at the final intermission 50:57. Nizhny Novgorod scored 23 points in the fourth frame and sealed the winning outcome. Petr Gubanov chipped in 16 points, while Semen Antonov had 10 points for Nizhny Novgorod. Errick McCollum responded with 22 points for Panionios. Marc Antonio Carter had 9 points in the defeat.
 N.NOVGOROD (coach: Sergey Kozin)80 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 86 | whIBpsIj, ganIj | 48 | 0-0 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 1-1 (655%) | 6 | 65 | 66 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 36 | 5 |
| 66 | SjUIjIL, ARBRj | 45 | 5-8 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 64 | KhLIsUIL, gBaUQF | 87 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 85 | Oijaj, kidaB | 80 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 66 | 5 |
| 60 | GuMijIL, ORUQ | 84 | 1-1 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 61 | 84 | 5 |
| 68 | KIQIMVIL, OiLRl | 61 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | miMuQaj, qLDRja | 60 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| 88 | eIZhRsUaR, wiFlIQ | 63 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-3 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | -8 | 5 |
| 65 | oLlRL, klidaBaQ | 7 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 84 | AiLRlFRL, oLij | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 9 | mQRJRZ, OQaBIJ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 86-82 (90.5%) | 9-62 (42.7%) | 69-86 (26.5%) | 4 | 80 | 82 | 83 | 86 | 88 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 68 | 25 | 650 | |||
 PANIONIOS (coach: Nenad Markovic)67 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 62 | KaQaUsas, SlRxas | 81 | 6-0 (85%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | CiQURQ, biQZ SjUIjaI | 83 | 5-4 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | bZCIlluB, qQQaZV | 88 | 9-2 (29.0%) | 6-3 (80%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 88 | 84 | 5 |
| 60 | vijDfIQd, KRLaj | 85 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| 7 | balMIuQjR, vijdIj | 85 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | -8 | 5 |
| 9 | guLjniV, tQIs | 60 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 68 | 5 |
| 69 | AFBUsiV, kissalas | 60 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 68 | AVIQdalas, GiaIs | 63 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | SUhijisIulis, Gaijjas | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -0 | 5 |
| 67 | AilIusUQIs, ChQasUIs | 65 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| 66 | miUas, biQaIs | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 61 | baZhRl, GuF-biQZ | 9 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 69-36 (36.0%) | 9-61 (34.2%) | 68-61 (90.5%) | 9 | 69 | 83 | 7 | 88 | 86 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 01 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
