Eurocup
Top 16 Round 6: Nanterre - Joventut 88-95
Date: March 9, 2021
The guests trailed by 3 points after first quarter, but they rallied back to get the 2-point lead at the halftime and eventually won the game 95-88. Joventut made 20-of-25 free shots (80.0 percent) during the game. Guard Pau Ribas (194-87) scored 16 points and 6 assists (went 11 for 11 at the free throw line !!!) to lead the charge for the winners and Croatian center Ante Tomic (217-87) chipped in 18 points and 5 rebounds during the contest. Four Joventut players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American guard Marcquise Reed (190-95, college: Clemson, agency: Pensack Sports) with 27 points and Isaia Cordinier (196-96) scored 15 points, 5 rebounds and 7 assists. Both coaches tested many bench players saving starting five for next games.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Top 16 Round 6: Nanterre - Joventut 88-95
Date: March 9, 2021
The guests trailed by 3 points after first quarter, but they rallied back to get the 2-point lead at the halftime and eventually won the game 95-88. Joventut made 20-of-25 free shots (80.0 percent) during the game. Guard Pau Ribas (194-87) scored 16 points and 6 assists (went 11 for 11 at the free throw line !!!) to lead the charge for the winners and Croatian center Ante Tomic (217-87) chipped in 18 points and 5 rebounds during the contest. Four Joventut players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American guard Marcquise Reed (190-95, college: Clemson, agency: Pensack Sports) with 27 points and Isaia Cordinier (196-96) scored 15 points, 5 rebounds and 7 assists. Both coaches tested many bench players saving starting five for next games.
JOVENTUT (coach: Daniel Miret)95 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 85 | missis, yRQQij | 89 | 5-6 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 68 | 5 |
| 63 | kRjUuQi, SlMRQU | 89 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | wIBaZ, SjUR | 88 | 7-68 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 62 | 69 | 5 |
| 65 | mQIdJaijsVF, klidaBaQ | 88 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| 3 | eaMis, Oiu | 86 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 66-66 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 61 | 89 | 5 |
| 1 | vIpRJ-SQIsURDua, NiMaRQ | 86 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 64 | 69 | 5 |
| 7 | bIQDij, CIjIQ | 67 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 5 | gaBaUQanRLaZ, XRjid | 62 | 9-9 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 69 | 5 |
| 40 | maQDijdRQ, AaBIj | 69 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 33 | OiQQi, zIRl | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 64 | OiQQidI, SQjiu | 6 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 6 | giTsIj, AhiTj | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 83-41 (11.9%) | 7-84 (47.6%) | 85-80 (25.5%) | 7 | 83 | 44 | 85 | 88 | 80 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 65 | 70 | 661 | |||
NANTERRE (coach: Julien Mahe)88 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 65 | CIQdajaRQ, osiai | 42 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 88 | 5 |
| 5 | eRRd, biQZEuasR | 81 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 0-0 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 89 | 81 | 5 |
| 44 | AUIjR, wFlRQ | 81 | 6-9 (63.4%) | 8-0 (35%) | 4-0 (15%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 65 | 5 |
| 17 | WiQQRj, ChQas | 84 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | eRMaZ, XaVIli | 67 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 63 | CIjVlaj, mQaij | 61 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 66 | KiMi, Slphi | 60 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 68 | 5 |
| 9 | yRLQaRQ, oLij | 63 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | -4 | 5 |
| 2 | mIuEuRU, giBaRj | 63 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 6 | mRQhijRBRsVRl, zIhjjF | 64 | 6-8 (05%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 4 | yIQUis, ylIQaij | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 61 | qFijDI-gajDI, AiBuRl | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 86-35 (08.0%) | 66-81 (38.4%) | 64-62 (98.8%) | 65 | 69 | 89 | 85 | 81 | 88 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 66 | 22 | 20 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#4 PAU RIBAS
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #0 MARCQUISE REED
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)






