EuroChallenge

Top 16 Round 5: Spartak SP - Lukoil Academik 86-80

Date: February 22, 2011
Spartak Saint-Petersburg win EuroChallenge Group A due to unbelievable comeback in the last minutes of the game versus Lukoil Academic. The Russian Powerhouse needed 11-0 run at the every end for 86:80 total success. It was one of the most interesting and unpredictable games probably of the whole tournament so far. Lukoil Academic started the game with 7-0 run and had 14-3 in the middle of the quarter. Spartak Saint-Petersburg managed somehow to reduce to 21:17 after 10 minutes. The second quarter belonged to the Russian team as they needed 27-20 for 44:41 lead at the halftime. Moreover another 23-15 allowed them to taste 67:56 lead after three quarters. Whatever happened later in the game, the hosts could make guilty themselves. Kolesnikov gave his side 69:56, but then Lukoil Academic erupted with 20-0 run! Dominic James made it 76:69, but his team could not keep the win. Trailing 7 points with 3 minutes Spartak responded with 11-0 run and then Antic, Beverley and Korchagin brought the win from the free throw line. Beverley top-scored for the winners with 24 points for 5-0 record. Antic nailed 13, while Ponkrashov and Domercant added 12 each. Dominic James shined in defeat with 25 points, whilst Green and Stojanovski supported him with 10 each.
  LUKOIL ACADEMIK80
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
36 AujdIL, mQujI 46 5-8 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6-8 (05%) 5 4 4 6 0 5 5 5 5 8 9 5 5
38 ORURQsIj, wQiLas 82 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 0 0 6 8 5 6 5 5 5 3 7 5
66 GQRRj, gRLaj 81 0-2 (18.0%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 1 9 4 4 5 8 6 5 8 65 63 5
0 ziBRs, gIBajaZ 83 1-7 (11.9%) 8-0 (35%) 9-9 (655%) 6 8 4 0 0 5 5 5 5 6 80 86 5
60 AUIFVIL, wIdIQ 69 3-3 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 6 8 5 5 5 5 6 2 2 5
65 SLQiBIL, mIJhadiQ 86 5-4 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 3-3 (655%) 6 8 4 4 3 5 5 5 5 4 3 -8 5
45 AUInijILsVa, giBnij 61 8-8 (655%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 0 5 8 5 5 6 65 9 5
3 HRiUh, mQijdIj 61 6-4 (44.4%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 0 5
83 kRsRlajIL, kRsRlaj 64 6-4 (44.4%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 3 1 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 8 4 5
63 mijRL, wRjZhI 2 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 8 -4 5
1 yQijZas, AiBuRl  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
64 bijZhRL, ChQasUaij  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   86-49 (01.2%) 2-86 (42.6%) 63-69 (28.3%) 1 87 40 69 82 5 0 6 5 61 25 18  


  SPARTAK SP86
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
  mRLRQlRF, OiUQaZV 42 2-66 (98.9%) 6-4 (44.4%) 0-9 (96.3%) 8 1 2 3 4 5 4 8 5 4 83 82 5
62 OIjVQishIL, SjUIj 48 8-2 (80%) 8-0 (35%) 8-8 (655%) 6 8 4 1 0 5 6 5 5 8 68 1 5
64 cupij, bahi 80 8-3 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 9 1 5
33 gIBRQZijU, HRjQF 69 8-0 (35%) 6-4 (44.4%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 8 5 5 6 68 1 5
69 OIpILaZ, ORUiQ 69 4-3 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 6 4 5 8 5 5 6 1 2 5
84 SjUaZ, ORQI 89 6-8 (05%) 8-9 (82.1%) 0-1 (24.4%) 4 0 2 0 8 5 6 6 5 5 64 67 5
9 KIUashRLsVaF, SlRVsRF 88 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 4-4 (655%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 5
83 KIlRsjaVIL, qLDRjaF 2 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5 5 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 8 -8 5
44 gQiDILaZ, XaVIli 9 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 4 5 5
63 cIJulaj, SlRVsRF 3 5-6 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -3 5
1 KIQZhiDaj, SlRxijdQ 8 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 5
86 gFiZhIV, klidaBaQ  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   67-41 (08.2%) 7-89 (44.4%) 86-82 (90.5%) 9 86 82 67 84 5 7 4 5 7 21 96  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)