EuroChallenge

Top 16 Round 3: EWE Baskets - Leiden 85-62

Date: January 24, 2012
EWE Basket rout ZZ Leiden in Oldenburg for 2-1 record in Group I. The German team did not have much troubles in a 85:62 victory. The team from Netherlands fell at 1-2 record. The hosts took the early lead in the game and enjoyed 27:14 after the first period. Moreover they added 23-13 in the second frame for 23-point lead at the halftime. In the third quarter EWE Basket produced a 24-21 surge and led the game to the victory. The guests managed to win the last period 14-11 but fell in the game. Hasbrouck top-scored for the winners with 16 points and Burrell posted 13. Smeulders collected 10 points and 12 rebounds, while Majstorovic added 10. Boxley netted 20 points in the losing effort and Worthy De Jong scored 11.
  EWE BASKETS85
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 mQITj, mIMMF 40 6-0 (85%) 5-0 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 6 6 8 7 4 5 5 5 5 8 0 4 5
36 HisMQIuZV, KRjjF 48 0-9 (96.3%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 3 8 5 4 5 5 3 61 61 5
84 OiuldajD, eaZVRF 87 4-3 (90%) 5-8 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5 3 3 4 8 5 8 6 5 6 2 64 5
45 muQQRll, eIjild 67 6-0 (85%) 8-8 (655%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 0 0 6 0 5 8 5 5 8 64 64 5
66 ChuMM, SdiB 62 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5 0 0 5 3 5 5 6 5 6 7 64 5
68 ABRuldRQs, eIMaj 82 0-9 (96.3%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 0 9 68 8 8 5 5 5 5 8 65 85 5
0 mihaRjsR dR bRllI, gIBajaV 69 5-6 (5%) 4-0 (15%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 8 5 6 5 5 6 7 0 5
88 ARhILaZ, ARid 64 6-8 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 6 4 5 6 5 5 6 0 0 5
65 binsUIQILaZ, balij 2 6-6 (655%) 8-8 (655%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 5 3 5 5 5 5 4 65 0 5
83 yQRRsR, zijjaV  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
7 eiJas, ChQasUIphRQ  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
85 ABaU, KRLaj  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   86-42 (00.4%) 65-84 (34.0%) 64-69 (91.0%) 9 87 41 85 89 5 7 8 5 69 20 74  


  LEIDEN (coach: Douglas Spradley)62
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 mIxlRF, ARiBus 40 9-64 (04.2%) 6-3 (80%) 4-1 (05%) 4 4 1 8 4 5 5 5 5 8 85 62 5
60 AhRphRQd, zRLIhj 89 4-7 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 4-9 (38.7%) 8 4 0 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 7 1 5
66 KhRQQiJa, bIhiBBRd 89 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 3-65 (35%) 6 7 65 6 0 5 6 6 5 6 2 63 5
63 CujjajDhiB, ARij 83 6-3 (80%) 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 6 4 3 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 5
0 ziZVsIj, whIBis 84 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 8 4 5 8 5 5 5 5 8 5
3 AliDURQ, SQLaj 89 4-9 (38.7%) 5-0 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 4 6 3 6 3 5 5 5 5 8 7 6 5
1 dR zIjD, WIQUhF 83 0-2 (18.0%) 5-8 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8 5 8 6 6 5 4 6 5 3 66 2 5
7 Ais, wRQQF 64 5-6 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 8 8 3 8 6 5 5 5 5 6 4 3 5
64 HallaBij, OiUQaZV  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
9 KRjjRdF, GiMR  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   86-32 (34.2%) 8-61 (68.0%) 63-46 (30.8%) 60 88 49 68 67 5 1 8 5 63 18 00  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)