FIBA Europe Cup

Second Stage Round 6: TU/Rock - Enisey 70-96

Date: February 2, 2016
No shocking result in a game in Tartu where second ranked Russian Enisey (3-3) outleveled 4th ranked Estonian TU/Rock (1-5) 96-70 on Tuesday. The game without a history. Enisey led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. They made 18-of-21 free shots (85.7 percent) during the game. Enisey had a 32-19 advantage in offensive rebounds. American swingman David Kennedy (198-89, college: St.John's) had a double-double by scoring 19 points and 12 rebounds to lead the charge for the winners and American-Guyanese forward Delroy James (203-87, college: Rhode Island) chipped in 18 points, 6 rebounds and 6 assists during the contest. Enisey's coach felt very confident that he used 10 players and allowed the starting five to rest. The best for the losing side was Canadian-Lithuanian point guard Evaldas Zabas (188-88) with 11 points and 4 assists and Janar Talts (205-83) scored 11 points and 5 rebounds. Five Enisey and four TU/Rock players scored in double figures. Despite that victory Enisey went down to fourteenth position (Group R) due to points difference, which they share with AEK and Tsmoki-Minsk. Defending Estonian champion TU/Rock dropped to the sixteenth place with five games lost.

  ENISEY (coach: Jovica Arsic)96
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
0 ziBRs, gRlQIF 40 1-9 (20.9%) 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4 4 1 1 4 5 6 6 5 8 62 83 5
7 KRjjRdF, giLad 45 1-65 (15%) 6-4 (44.4%) 3-0 (25%) 5 68 68 4 5 5 6 5 5 0 67 84 5
86 wiFlIQ, wIjF 45 3-1 (11.9%) 8-0 (35%) 4-4 (655%) 6 8 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 8 69 64 5
2 PhlMQRZhU, waB 81 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 5 9 9 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 68 64 5
45 OaZhVuQIL, klidaBaQ 7 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 8 5
3 kJdFVhilVaj, SlRxRF 86 5-6 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 3-3 (655%) 6 6 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 61 60 5
64 ciVhiQIL, gRjas 62 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 5
69 YiVILRjVI, SQURB 64 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 4 3 8 4 5 5 6 5 8 4 6 5
65 ARQDRRL, OiLRl 65 5-5 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 8-8 (655%) 5 8 8 6 0 5 8 5 5 5 2 9 5
83 OiLlIL, SlRVsijdQ 3 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 -6 5
8 osiVIL, SQURB  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
9 KIBiQILsVaF, SjdQRF  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   86-41 (02.4%) 68-83 (05.5%) 62-86 (20.9%) 1 48 42 69 85 5 0 8 5 64 71 70  


  TU/ROCK (coach: Aivar Kuusmaa)70
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
86 HiQpRQ, mQaij 80 3-7 (33.3%) 5-8 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 6 0 1 6 3 5 6 5 5 3 65 5 5
1 gIQMRV, GRQU 83 5-6 (5%) 4-9 (38.7%) 4-3 (90%) 6 6 8 8 4 5 5 5 5 6 68 1 5
0 kRjR, KRjU-KiiQRl 84 6-8 (05%) 8-1 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 5 4 5 6 5 5 5 2 0 5
60 ORUQuVIjas, KiQIlas 84 6-66 (7.6%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 4 5 4 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 3 -3 5
3 AIVV, wijRl 86 3-2 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 2 0 5
83 ciMis, qLildis 43 4-7 (44.4%) 6-1 (61.9%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6 8 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 6 66 6 5
65 AuUU, AiaBIj 85 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 8 4 5 5 5 5 6 4 4 5
2 wilUs, zijiQ 63 3-0 (25%) 5-6 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 4 8 0 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 66 66 5
64 bRasURQ, KQasURj 66 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4 8 5
66 gIQIjaj, biQRV  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
88 KuQMis, wijRl  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   69-31 (49.5%) 2-81 (45.2%) 68-85 (15.5%) 66 67 45 68 84 5 8 5 5 9 95 87  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)